![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
ARTICLES
It all started with a link that a friend posted on Facebook and the rest, for me, has been the performance of identification on cyberspace. The FIFA World Cup 2010 is the buzz that has taken the world on roar for sometime now and ESPN has released their advertising campaign for such an event in the form of ‘murals’ as they are calling it.
Here I slightly counter to the identification of these visuals as to be murals as by the term we understand a painting done directly on wall. And in the present context, these visuals have been distributed in the virtual space but plans to incorporate them to print ads, bill boards, bus shelters, food trucks, art books, digital banners and also as hand painted murals on building (as one of the options) as forms of executions.
But in whichever form we might receive them, the visuals created by nine South African artists in three months under the illustration house AM I COLLECTIVE awaits much recognition for its global campaign with an African base. A total of 32 visuals celebrate 32 country teams participating in the World Cup 2010 and one for the collective spirit of the World Cup as a whole. The exhilarating first look of these images urged me to share this univocal subjectivity taking a position on multiple ethnicities.
While working on the 33 visuals created for the proliferation of World Cup 2010, the first thing that came to my mind, before reading the pictures, was my mode of access to them. All what I did behind putting up this written piece was to sit in front of my computer and hover into the cyber world. I collected all the possible information from this virtual space which is nowhere or somewhere and referred them to structure my opinion. Here I encounter a question from myself – if utopia is becoming more than a pleasure domain for us? Sherman and Judkins are intoxicated by it all. Virtual Reality, they say, ‘is the hope for the next century. It may indeed afford glimpses of Heaven.’ When I read this, I can hardly believe my eyes. We must consider what these spectacular flights of fantasy are all about.
To follow on with the recent subject of discussion, the links to these visuals for the World Cup 2010 also mention that these hand-painted images are done keeping a reference to the hand-painted movie posters from
The iconographic structuring of the 33 paintings draws me to its identification and interpretation of the content. And to do this, I count my observations separately with every country represented. Though not considered to be ranked high among the participating teams of the World Cup, the image fashioned for
Uruguay represents the ‘Sun of May’ which is a symbol of freedom and independence, the emblem in its national flag holding two trophies that it won when it was known as the Jules Rimet trophy which was awarded to the winners of World Cup from 1930 to 1970. Simply known as the World Cup or Coupe du Monde, it was officially renamed in 1946 to honor the FIFA President Jules Rimet, who in 1929 passed a vote to initiate the competition for the game of football. The blue and white background for the cloud and sky also has its reference to the nine alternating stripes of white and blue horizontal bands which represents nine provinces of the country, which existed during the time of the flag’s creation.
The picture for
Uncomplicated structuring of the composition and singular perspective defined the background for
Certain minimalist suggestions as in the
Such picture codes follow with
While pointing out details of every individual picture, what passes through my mind is the question on their execution which shows a singular mode of stylisation. Though worked by nine individual artists we only know them as AM I COLLECTIVE and notably enough, the spirit of collaborative/collective performance is generated. And as collaborative art projects have moved into the mainstream of cultural reproduction, it does raise questions of authorship, authenticity, their relationship with the work and the work’s relationship with its viewer. Without resisting this scope, I will try to articulate the justifying relations of making art by the people, to the people and for the people.
The time that I live in does not offer me the romanticism of just appreciating a picture/visual which does not show me its purpose in my life, in me, within my social context. I have accepted and appreciated art as I have come to know in history but that does not allow me to consider pretty visuals as a functioning statement. The country pictures created for the FIFA World Cup 2010 has reestablished in me my view of connectivity, community within the public sphere. Their formations have been simple and raw and their focus was on recognising the country more than the team so that it can be communicable to everybody at any part of the world. Keeping a native flavor alive and creating this global uniqueness in the paintings is where I see the success of the project. At the same time, I cannot deny the resemblance its carries with the paintings done on the walls of the city lanes in my country, or the painted movie posters that existed far back in time. After such annotations one might hardly question the existing link that connects the cultures of the world.
Going with the spirit of the game, the drama has been strategically introduced in every painting with a difference in its ratio. As for
Also for
References:
1. I owe to my friends for their informative contribution.
2.
3. http://www.prosebeforehos.com/sports-editor/06/01/espn’s-2010-fifa-world-cup-murals-for-32-nations/
4. http://www.vanityfair.com/online/fairplay/the-32-teams/index2.html
(Sampurna Chakraborty studied Art History from Kala Bhavana,